It's a big day. Election day in NSW. Will the voters give Baird another run? Knowing about #icac the resignations, the corruption. Knowing of the intent Baird has to lease/sell power to China for 99 years ,when it's a genuine revenue raiser. Knowing that he has the intent to cut funding to disabilities services. Knowing his intent to explore #CSG without concern for the environmental impacts.
Living in Victoria I'm not fully across the talent pool in #NSWpol .I'm not across the viability of other candidates. If I lived there I'd make it a priority to investigate. The best candidates for parliament should get the best outcomes.
I hope the people see through the facade. Baird is little more than a polished Abbott. I hope the inaccuracy of polling is displayed today. I hope the people of NSW vote on the issues and #BootBaird.
Wednesday, 11 March 2015
It is not an illusion not even a magic trick. Federal treasurer Joe Hockey takes his allowance when he stays at his family home in Canberra. This matter requires investigation by the relevant authorities.I assume them to be the AFP. An allowance comes from the taxes we pay. It is to cover expenses of staying away from home. It is not being used by Hockey in this way. He is using it for investment purposes,assuming of course that there is a mortgage which is unproven. It is possible that the property is owned fully.If so where is the cost to Mr Hockey? The home is apparently in three names his wife the major holder Joe and another family member. This matter should be audited. Hockey claims to be compliant with laws claims to believe in transparency. How is investing our money for his personal profit not gaining financial advantage via deception? There is no risk to Mr Hockey at all in this investment,only to the taxpayer.
This doesn't even account for the hypocrisy of Hockey. Using his allowance in this way when claiming the minions need to share the pain moving forward. It sickens me personally that any of our politicians would go down this path. If as Hockey claims in defence. "others are doing it " . They should also be audited and if profiting treated in the same way I hope Joe is by the authorities.
Now eleventy Joe Hockey has been gifted a plum role. He claims it's a privilege to serve us? When is he going to start? He has only ever shown signs of helping himself whenever he can.
Tuesday, 3 March 2015
|Yes, I am reporting a Commonwealth crime|
|Dear Sir /Madam, I wish to formally complain that the Prime Minister refuses to respond to allegations he has lied to the AEC in relation to his dual citizen status. Not only has he failed to provide renouncement documents. An FOI search has also stated from his office that these documents do not exist.Also adding credence to our belief that he is in breach, Peta Credlin has interfered In two previous FOI requests. Letters have been sent to the Attorney General Mr. Brandis, requesting that this crime be investigated and the documents are tabled in the House of Representatives.Ignoring a crime is an offence in itself. In 4 months we have not had a response from Mr. Brandis Mr. Keenan Mr. Dreyfus Mr. Shorten Mr. Thomson they are all in our eyes complicit in their apathy. If Tony Abbott has made false declarations to the AEC to run for parliament then his earnings and entitlements are proceeds of crime. His 20-year political career has no foundation. The Australian Constitution is and should be the foundation of Australian politics and adherence to its laws isn't optional and must be enforced. We have over 23,000 signatures on change.org of Australian voters wanting this matter addressed. Based on the premise that Mr. Abbott has lied to the AEC prior to running for parliament. His earnings, allowances, and other entitlements are proceeds of crime.To refute this, all he has to do is show that he complied with the Constitution s44.1 by renouncing his UK Citizenship prior to running in 1994. regards Mark Dickenson|
Whilst for privacy reasons I cannot provide you with the AFP response.Not mine theirs. I can tell you the response was well past the timeline required. It also had no signs they were taking the issue seriously. Including the fact they have not made contact to seek any evidence I may have to support my claim. It seems authorities in Australia pick and choose when they look into compliance.Which must bring into question their integrity?